Water Has Memory

Water Has Memory

Against Irrigation on a Timer

Table Of Contents

Tuesday at 6am. Eight minutes. Every week, regardless of what the previous week looked like.

This is how most residential and small-scale commercial irrigation systems work. A timer, a programme, a schedule built around the convenience of the person who installed it rather than the needs of the living system it’s meant to serve. The controller doesn’t know that it rained 20mm on Sunday. It doesn’t know the soil is still saturated. It doesn’t know the canopy is wet and adding more water will encourage the fungal disease that’s been lurking at the edges of the patch for a fortnight.

Tuesday at 6am. Eight minutes. The garden gets watered whether it’s thirsty or not.


The Driest Inhabited Continent

South Australia is not a forgiving place to waste water.

We receive about 240mm of rainfall annually in Adelaide — less than half of London, less than a third of Brisbane. The River Murray, which supplies drinking water to 1.5 million South Australians and irrigates some of the most productive agricultural land in the country, arrives here after travelling 2,500km through a catchment that has been over-allocated for decades. The Murray-Darling Basin Plan — the largest water reform in Australian history — exists precisely because we extracted more water from the system than the system could sustain, and rivers stopped reaching the sea.

Water scarcity isn’t an abstract concern here. It’s embedded in the landscape, in the salinity readings from the lower Murray, in the dust storms that crossed the state during the Millennium Drought. Anyone who gardens or farms in South Australia with a timer-based irrigation system is participating, however modestly, in a pattern of indifference toward a resource that is finite, contested, and increasingly stressed.

The alternative isn’t complex. It’s listening.


What the Soil Is Actually Saying

Soil communicates. Not in language we can hear, but in measurable states that tell us exactly what it needs. Volumetric water content — what we usually call soil moisture — is the most direct signal: the percentage of the soil’s volume occupied by water. Below a certain threshold, plants begin to experience water stress. Above a certain threshold, the soil becomes anaerobic and roots begin to rot.

That threshold isn’t fixed. It varies by soil type, by crop, by growth stage, by temperature.


The South Australian Soil Spectrum

If you’re growing in South Australia, you’re likely dealing with one of three very different “soil memories”:

  • Adelaide Black Clay: Found throughout the plains, this soil has a long memory. It holds water tightly, swells when wet, and shrinks to leave deep cracks when dry. A sensor here is vital to prevent anaerobic conditions from over-watering, which can happen long before the surface looks wet.
  • Coastal Sands: From the Fleurieu to the Eyre Peninsula, sandy soils have almost no memory. Water passes through in minutes. Here, sensors help you time frequent, low-volume “pulses” of water that keep the root zone hydrated without wasting expensive water to the deep subsoil.
  • Terra Rossa: The iconic red soils of the Limestone Coast and parts of the Barossa are a balancer — good drainage but decent holding capacity. Sensors here help you find the “sweet spot” where you can maximize the unique terroir of the region.

A timer can’t know any of this. A sensor can.

The soil sensors we use in our LoRaWAN irrigation systems measure volumetric water content and temperature directly in the root zone. That’s enough to stop watering into already-saturated ground, to irrigate before heat stress sets in rather than after, and to track how quickly moisture is depleting between cycles.

Leaf wetness sensors add another layer. A plant with wet foliage doesn’t need more water landing on its canopy. Beyond the waste, wet foliage is an invitation to fungal disease: powdery mildew, Botrytis, downy mildew. The sensor reads what we can see if we’re paying attention — but it reads it at 3am when we’re asleep, in every zone simultaneously, and it acts on what it finds.


LoRaWAN and the Farm

The challenge with soil-responsive irrigation at scale is connectivity. Running sensor cables across a whole property is expensive, disruptive, and fragile. Cellular connectivity is the industrial solution, but cellular modems consume power quickly, incur per-message costs, and depend on carrier infrastructure that may not reach rural properties reliably.

LoRaWAN — Long Range Wide Area Network — is a different proposition. It operates on unlicensed spectrum, consumes almost no power, and can reach sensors 2-15km away from a gateway installed on a shed or farmhouse roof. A single gateway covers most small properties. The community LoRaWAN network that The Things Network South Australia has built across the Adelaide region provides free connectivity across a wide area, owned and operated by the community that uses it.

No monthly fees. No carrier dependency. No per-message billing.

The sensor nodes we’ve deployed read their suite of soil and atmospheric measurements, encode them into compact packets, and send them via LoRaWAN to a ChirpStack network server on local infrastructure. From there, the data flows into InfluxDB for time-series storage, Grafana for visualisation, and Home Assistant for automation — opening the right valve when soil moisture drops below threshold, closing it when the soil has received enough, holding off when leaf wetness is high.

The irrigation decision is no longer made at installation time and forgotten. It’s made continuously, in response to what the land is actually experiencing.


From Schedule to Conversation

There’s a deeper principle here beyond water conservation, though water conservation matters enormously.

Timer-based irrigation treats the garden or farm as a static system: set the schedule once, let it run. Sensor-responsive irrigation treats it as a living system: one that changes with the season, the weather, the growth stage, the soil biology. The difference between those two approaches is the difference between managing a machine and stewarding a place.

Regenerative agriculture emphasises observation — close attention to the land before intervening. But attention doesn’t scale without tools. A market gardener managing five hundred metres of drip tape across twelve beds cannot physically check soil moisture in every zone every morning. A sensor and a good automation system extend that attention into every corner of the property, continuously, without wearing out.

This is what sensing, in SEIN’s sense of the word, is about. Not surveillance. Not data collection for its own sake. But the infrastructure for paying better attention to living systems — and then responding to what we hear.


An Invitation to Build Differently

Both systems are deployed and generating real data in South Australian growing environments. Neither requires proprietary hardware or ongoing software subscriptions. Both can be assembled from components available in Australia, maintained locally, and adapted to your specific property and crop requirements.

They’re not finished products. The hardware and firmware are actively being tested and refined. Once documented and tested, we’ll open them up fully. If you’re interested in trialling a system on your property — and are comfortable with the reality that it’s still being worked on — we’d like to hear from you. We can supply hardware to people willing to help with testing and troubleshooting.

Water has been cycling through this landscape for millions of years. It has shaped the soils, carved the creeks, sustained the vegetation communities that European agriculture has spent two centuries disrupting. We owe it to the landscape to pay close attention and use it thoughtfully.

Tuesday at 6am, regardless — is no longer good enough.

Featured image by Sue Thompson on Flickr — CC BY-ND 2.0.

Share:

Comments

Be the first to comment! Reply to this post from your Mastodon/Fediverse or Bluesky account, or mention this post's URL in your reply. Your comment will appear here automatically via webmention.

Follow this blog on Mastodon at @sein.com.au@sein.com.au or on Bluesky at @sein.com.au

What's this?

The Physics of Freedom

The Physics of Freedom

There are ideas so powerful they echo across different domains, revealing a fundamental truth about how the world works. Reading through The Zen of Reticulum , a foundational text for a new kind of communication network, I was struck by how its principles are not just about technology, but about the very physics of freedom and resilience. Reticulum is a network stack designed for a world where communication cannot be taken for granted. It is built to function over any available medium, with no central servers, and with privacy and security as its bedrock. It is, in essence, a system designed for self-sovereignty. Its philosophy rejects the extractive, controlling architectures that have come to define so much of the modern internet.

Read More
From Healthier Soil To A Fairer Fork

From Healthier Soil To A Fairer Fork

Let’s be honest. The way we produce and consume food is broken. It’s a system that looks great on the surface, with supermarket shelves overflowing with produce from every corner of the globe, available any time of year. But when you dig a little deeper, you find a system built on a house of cards, and it’s costing us more than we think. Our industrial food system is a master of illusion. It presents abundance while creating scarcity—scarcity of nutrients in our food, of biodiversity in our fields, of topsoil on our farms, and of fairness for the people who grow it. It’s a system built on an extractive model, where value is pulled from the land, from communities, and from our own bodies, with little thought for the long-term consequences.

Read More
Part IV: Reclaiming Our Systems

Part IV: Reclaiming Our Systems

Part IV: Reclaiming Our Systems, Our Humanity, and the Future We’ve seen the damage. A legal fiction with no conscience now has immense control over how we eat, how we heal, and how we live. In this series, I’ve tried to trace how corporate personhood mutated into a monster with more rights and power than any single citizen. We’ve looked at how this structure turned our food system into a machine that profits from hunger and disease, and how it hijacked our health system to monetise sickness.

Read More