Re-Valuing Our Roots

Re-Valuing Our Roots

A New Story for Farm Technology

Table Of Contents

For most of my life, I’ve had one foot in the soil and the other in the digital world. It has been a journey of homecoming, a return to the values I learned growing up on a farm, looking after the land that sustained us. This journey has been guided by a single, persistent question: how can we build tools that honour nature’s complexity, instead of trying to conquer it?

The world doesn’t need another farm management system. It’s a crowded field, filled with tools that are often complex, expensive, and prescriptive. With few exceptions, they are designed to fit the farm into a box, to reduce the living, breathing art of agriculture to a series of industrial inputs and outputs. They ask farmers to speak the language of efficiency, a language that often feels alien to the principles of diversified, regenerative farming.

This approach forces us to leave the most important stories untold. The quiet, vital work of building soil, enhancing biodiversity, and stewarding water becomes invisible in the economic ledger. We are asking farmers to be ecologists, accountants, and data scientists, but giving them tools that only add to the chaos. The burden of proof falls squarely on the shoulders of those doing the most important work, without offering them a language to express its value.

This frustration, this sense of a story half-told, was the seed from which GrowGood sprouted. We’re not reinventing farming. We’re re-valuing it.

From Burden of Proof to a Story of Value

The core problem isn’t just clunky software or high subscription fees; it’s a fundamental mismatch in philosophy. Most farm software is built for extraction, not regeneration. It measures success in tonnes per hectare, not in nutritional density, soil carbon, or the return of native pollinators. This leads to critical issues for the farmers who are building a different future:

  1. Data is Siloed and Fragmented: Your soil health data doesn’t talk to your harvest records. Your water usage isn’t linked to your yield quality. This fragmentation makes it impossible to see the whole picture, to connect the health of your land to the true value of your produce.
  2. Ecological Work is Invisible: The system can’t account for the value of a cover crop, the benefit of a restored pollinator habitat, or the long-term investment in no-till practices. This essential work, the very foundation of regeneration, is treated as a cost, not an asset.
  3. Farmers are Locked In: Proprietary systems hold your data hostage in closed formats, creating dependency and preventing the free flow of knowledge that is the lifeblood of a resilient community. Your data should be yours, portable and powerful.
  4. Collaboration is Stifled: These tools are designed for individual optimisation, not collective intelligence. They isolate us at a time when we most need to be connected, sharing insights and building regional strength.

Cultivating a Digital Commons

We are building GrowGood as our answer to this challenge. This is not a product we’re selling, but a digital commons resource we are stewarding with and for the community. An open-source platform being built on a few core beliefs:

  • Software must adapt to the farm, not the other way around. We recognise that the work of a farmer in the field is vastly different from that of a farm administrator at a desk. That’s why we envision GrowGood with two distinct interfaces: a mobile-first Operational UI for quick, offline-capable data entry in the paddock, and a powerful Administrator UI for designing the deep, interconnected workflows of your farm. The right tool for the right job.

  • Record-keeping can be story-building. By using Valueflows as a common, open-standard language, our goal is to capture the natural ‘flow’ of the farm. Each action—from planting a seed to harvesting a crop, from moving livestock to applying compost—can become part of a verifiable story. A high-integrity, auditable log of not just what was produced, but how it was produced, making the invisible visible.

  • Technology should be a bridge, not an island. Data sovereignty is non-negotiable. GrowGood is being designed to connect farmers to a larger, interoperable network. Because the data will be structured with Valueflows , it will be portable and future-proof. This ensures your farm need not be a data island, but can become a node in a thriving, interconnected, and transparent bioregional economy.

  • We must cultivate a perennial public good. This platform is, and always will be, free and open-source. It is a tool for collaboration, not competition, being built to serve the regenerative movement for generations to come. We’re building infrastructure, not just an app.

This project aims to create technology that mirrors nature’s complexity and respects the farmer’s wisdom. A tool that will help you not only manage your farm, but tell its true story—a story of regeneration, connection, and hope.

In the next post, I’ll explore how our Blueprint system is designed to tell that story, creating a tool that can speak your farm’s unique language.

Join me. Let’s grow this together.

Attribution: Image by Juliek1967, CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Visit here

Share:

Comments

Be the first to comment! Reply to this post from your Mastodon/Fediverse or Bluesky account, or mention this post's URL in your reply. Your comment will appear here automatically via webmention.

Follow this blog on Mastodon at @sein.com.au@sein.com.au or on Bluesky at @sein.com.au

What's this?

From Varieties to Commodities

From Varieties to Commodities

Have you noticed how “choice” in the supermarket doesn’t really feel like choice anymore? A whole aisle of bread, yet most of it made from the same kind of wheat. Apples that all look perfect, but taste mostly of cold storage. Tomatoes that travel halfway around the world but somehow forgot what flavour is. Somewhere along the way, our food system got… simplified. Not for our benefit, but for the benefit of the system itself — the trucks, the supply chains, the supermarkets, the spreadsheets.

Read More
Speaking the Language of the Land

Speaking the Language of the Land

In our first conversation, we talked about the need to re-value farming—to move beyond tools of extraction and build something that honours the complexity of living systems. Now, let’s explore how we intend to do that. It starts by learning to speak the language of the land, one farm at a time. For too long, technology has demanded that farmers adapt to its rigid logic. The world of regenerative agriculture is diverse and dynamic—a market gardener thinks in beds and successions, a flower farmer in stems and bloom cycles, and a grazier in paddocks and pasture recovery times. Forcing them into a single, generic mould is not just inefficient; it’s an act of erasure. It silences the unique story of their farm.

Read More
A New Charter for the Forest

A New Charter for the Forest

Back in 1217, a group of rebellious barons forced King John to sign the Charter of the Forest. It was a revolutionary document for its time, a declaration that the forests of England were not the private hunting grounds of the king, but a vital resource for the common people. It protected their rights to graze their animals, collect firewood, and forage for food. It was, in essence, a charter for a forest commons.

Read More